Sentence examples for differences in the exposure from inspiring English sources
Although the ORs from different study regions (when available) are similar, there are substantial differences in the exposure distributions even within countries.
A comparison of the results of this juvenile study with an extended one-generation reproductive toxicity study revealed that the juvenile study design may result in a higher sensitivity related to differences in the exposure design.
These differences in the exposure response patterns can be (tentatively) explained in terms of the mechanisms for handling copper (an essential metal for earthworms) and cadmium (a putative nonessential element).
The combination of these aspects are ground for the observed variation in water availability across the GHMs, the differences in the exposure to water scarcity and, subsequently, the impacts of HI on freshwater resources and the critical dimensions of water scarcity.
This suggests differences in the exposure pattern in the individual countries [71].
He derived this distribution in a framework that allows separately for random factors, differences in the exposure of individuals to external risk of accident, and differences in proneness.
In each immunogen pair, one variant was readily neutralized by a variety of monoclonal antibodies and plasma antibodies, while the other was neutralization resistant, suggesting differences in the exposures of key epitopes.
Our own analysis of index constituents with unequal voting power revealed substantial differences in the exposures of these securities to risk and return drivers, compared to the overall equity market.
The analysis used patient-level data from each study to evaluate between-group differences in the exposure-adjusted incidence rates of adverse events.
Additional studies are needed to highlight similarities and differences in the exposure-response relationship of patterns and timing of sunlight exposure with BCC and SCC.
The response rates increased from 42.7% to 79.9%, but there were only marginal differences in the exposure-disease relationship and prevalence estimates when initial responders were compared with all responders.
