Sentence examples for differences in the cost effectiveness from inspiring English sources

The observed differences in the cost effectiveness ratios between trial arms were not significant.

In accordance with the results reported by Nikolic et al, there were small differences in the cost effectiveness results when analysing men and women separately, and at different ages.

These analyses did not account for differences in the dispensation of the medications, but do suggest that the differences in the cost effectiveness of these 3 drugs may be greater in practice than reported here.

Country specific demographic variables and patterns of social contact affect the transmission of influenza and may result in differences between the cost effectiveness of vaccines for countries with different demographic profiles.

Like Michiels et al., these authors noted marked variations across studies in approaches, settings, populations, and assumptions, which led to important differences in the cost-effectiveness estimates [ 71].

Accordingly, the differences in the cost-effectiveness profiles of rotavirus versus HPV vaccines across the 72 GAVI countries stem mainly from the differences in estimated disease burden and vaccine efficacy adjusted for serotype distributions.

The findings in the present investigation suggest that there may be significant differences in the cost-effectiveness of orthodontic care when viewed from a pan-European perspective, but this is largely explained by the differences in costs.

Our cost-effectiveness results should be considered preliminary since the composite costs for vaccine purchase and delivery were assumed to be the same for both vaccines and uniform across all GAVI-eligible countries, and thus the differences in the cost-effectiveness results primarily reflect the relative disease burden within and across each of the GAVI countries.

Within sub-Saharan Africa, the only country-specific cost-effective analysis for a range of interventions was conducted in Nigeria and found approximate correspondence with the regional data in the rank order of cost-effectiveness of interventions, but differences in the cost-effectiveness ratios for each intervention (26, 73).

The key input parameter affecting the cost effectiveness was the relative risk of death from breast cancer; small differences in this parameter made substantial differences to the cost effectiveness.

Three recent studies demonstrated no significant difference in the cost-effectiveness of centre- versus home-based programs [ 25, 26, 28].