The phrase "differences in the conclusions" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing varying outcomes or interpretations derived from different analyses or perspectives.
Example: "The researchers noted significant differences in the conclusions drawn from the two studies."
Alternatives: "variations in the findings" or "discrepancies in the results."
Maybe the use of so many microorganisms growing under such different growth conditions could explain, at least in part, the differences in the conclusions reached by authors regarding the best-fitting model.
Hence it is interesting to examine the differences in the conclusions obtained when statistical tests are used to compare the performance of prediction methods based on the empirical estimates of their performance on the UPDS, SRDS1, SRDS2, SRDS3, and WPDS versions of the datasets.
However, there are some important differences in the conclusions reached.
This controversy has recently been rekindled by differences in the conclusions based on neuroanatomical data concerning the chelifore and the patterns of Hox expression.
These analyses revealed no substantive differences in the conclusions from using logistic models with the lowest quartile of cognitive performance as the outcome.
Results of this study demonstrate that differences in the conclusions can be drawn about trends in socioeconomic inequality in smoking, depending on whether trends in OR and PR were used.
The way the data from various studies is divvied up or combined in a meta-analysis can make a big difference in the conclusions.
We tested that there was no difference in the conclusions by either taking the threshold at 5% or 20%, thus indicating that results are robust.
We carried out pooled analyses including either the case/control comparison or the TDT subgroup from that study; there was no material difference in the conclusions whichever population was included (data available on request).
There was no difference in the conclusions we reached by either method.
Importantly, there was no difference in the conclusions from the two types of measurements, as both PCNA staining and EdU pulsing indicated a 1.8 increase in ependymoglia proliferation upon re-oxygenation compared to control animals.
