Sentence examples for differences in the clauses from inspiring English sources

This section describes in detail the differences in the clauses with relevant tokens in both the ST and TTs.

This difference is only one example of a distinction that can be made based upon syntactic differences in the clause structure.

Given the slight difference of the clauses with relevant tokens in the TT1 and TT2, 79.82 and 82.39%, respectively, Hawkes' version is more explicit than Yang's in the construction of structure that realizes the coherence of the text.

In English, the presence or absence of the Mood element realizes distinctions between unmarked imperative and indicative clauses, while differences in the ordering of the elements (as well as the present or absence of a WH- element) realize the distinction between declarative and interrogative clauses.

Between the two English TTs, the difference in the percentage of clauses with relevant tokens is not significant, being only 2.57%.

The relevant tokens in the clauses are labelled bold.

" "Which" is considered a non-restrictive element in the clause.

From the MONOTONE ONE-IN-THREE SAT perspective, the third gadget enforces the rule that if a literal is chosen to be set true in one clause, it must be chosen to be true in all of the clauses it belongs to.

Results show that, in academic writing, passive verbs are more frequent in the main clauses of extraposed sentences, and the most common extraposed clause is that-clause rather than to-clauses.

The ST contains the least clause simplexes in the cohesive chains: 81 clause simplexes only form about 4.01% of all the clauses in chains.

Finally, look for tripwires in the termination clauses.