Sentence examples for differences in the assignments from inspiring English sources

Consistent with previous comparative studies (Colloc'h et al., 1993; Martin et al., 2005), we see considerable differences in the assignments.

Here, the differences in the assignment of structural domains are evaluated using six common assignment methods.

Our study aimed to determine whether there are significant differences in the assignment of ASA-PS by non-anesthesia providers when compared to anesthesia providers.

Despite the differences in the assignment, comparative analysis between these two types of domains revealed overall equivalency in the domain families [ 16].

As this can only partly be achieved, we used a mixed model approach to account for remaining patient-specific effects (i.e. consistent inter-individual differences in the assignment of blood loss to categories of bleeding intensity).

As before, we found significant differences in the lineage assignments of several blastocyst samples when we compared our assignments with those of Yan et al. (supplementary material Fig. S4E).

There is, however, an important difference in the assignment of truth values to sentences.

While the COX variable had similar mortality rates to WGCNA and WGCNA*, there was a substantial 35% difference in the assignment of patients to mortality groups (Table 3, Additional File 1).

This is easily understood due to the minor (and no) differences in the threshold assignments resulting from the two methods.

In these analyses, the FET calculates the exact probability of significant differences in the reported assignments of women and men.

In these analyses, the FET calculates the exact probability of significant differences in the reported assignments of participants in the two intervention conditions.