Sentence examples for differences in the assays from inspiring English sources
Cross-comparing results from different studies are often complicated by the differences in the assays utilised for experiments of this nature (i.e. in vivo versus in vitro enzyme assays) and/or the choice of analytical methods used to generate the data (i.e. degradation of carotenoids versus formation of apocarotenoids).
Yet, significant test performance differences exist, including differences in the assays' reproducibility near their lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) [6] [8].
Aside from differences in the assays utilized, SVR was the defined endpoint in the genome-wide association study (GWAS) identifying rs12979860 [8], whereas null responsiveness to interferon was used in the analysis that endorsed rs12980275 and rs8099917 [10].
However, technical differences in the assays used to measure protein aggregation and toxicity complicate this interpretation.
Such a discrepancy may be due to differences in the assays used to assess disease resistance.
Key array features to consider include: (1) the low-copy centromeric plasmid backbone (CEN) of the FLEX collection vs. the high-copy backbone (2 μ) of the GST collection; (2) the quality of each ORF in each collection (sequenced verified in the FLEX collection but not in others); (3) the particular strain background used and; (4) differences in the assays used to measure gene toxicity.
There was little difference in the assays' ability to detect prostate mRNA in advanced PC patients.
However, a study on diagnostic methods for brucellosis where IgG and IgM antibodies were measured simultaneously found little difference in the assays.
To exclude that increased cell death causes the differences in the flux assays, we performed Annexin V and propidium iodide (PI) staining.
