Sentence examples for differences in the admission from inspiring English sources

There were no significant differences in the admission prevalence or ICU acquisition of resistant bacteria (Table 1 and Figure 2; P = 0.615).

If we excluded activity from the first three months of the trial, differences in the admission proportion would not have been significant under any of the models.

In a study of 203 patients aged 65 years or older with diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke, no significant differences in the admission or discharge National Institutes of Health Stroke Status and modified Rankin scores were observed between patients who had TIA (n = 42, 21%) within 72 hours of stroke onset and those without TIA (n = 161, 79%).

Secondary analysis of the Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression (fig 3) confirmed that differences in the admission proportion remained significant after censoring observations at death (hazard ratio 0.87, 95% confidence interval 0.78 to 0.98, implying fewer admissions for the telehealth than control group).

Technically, there is no difference in the admission standards for those who apply early in the admission cycle and those who apply later.

Subset analysis of these seven physicians' practice behavior revealed a slight significant difference in the admission rate pre- and post-intervention (74.3% vs. 63.9%, p = 0.0495) and no significant difference in the head CT scan rate pre- and post-intervention (42.9% vs. 45.4%, p = 0.660).

There was a slight significant difference in the admission rate pre- and post-intervention for the subset of seven physicians who saw ten or more patients pre- and post-intervention (74.3% vs. 63.9%, respectively, p = 0.0495; see Table 4 and Fig. 3).

There was no significant difference in the admission rates postgastrostomy insertion in either age group.

There was no significant difference in the admission creatinine clearance between the two groups.

There is no difference in the admission rates pregastrostomy and postgastrostomy for children with gastrostomy insertion <18 or >18 months.

Hence, the improvement of renal function was reviewed by the difference in the admission creatinine and the lowest creatinine achieved or independence from dialysis if previously dialysis-requiring.