Sentence examples for differences in the adaptive from inspiring English sources
The results obtained for three representative populations differing in the value of μ1 at which they reached the previous stationary state are shown in Fig. 2. In the three cases considered we observe large differences in the adaptive dynamics depending on the value of μ2 used to adapt to the new selective pressure.
Effect sizes differed between traits under abiotic and biotic selection, putatively due to differences in the adaptive landscapes associated with these traits.
It appears remarkable that despite individual differences in the adaptive response to HA, diffusion limitation did not exceed ∼11% of the alveolar-venous PO2 gradient, revealing an admirable functional design of the air-blood barrier to defend the O2 diffusion/perfusion function when facing hypobaric hypoxia corresponding to 50 mmHg decreased PAO2.
The magnitude of SIV-specific T lymphocyte responses in sooty mangabeys during acute and chronic SIV infection is comparable to that in rhesus macaques [9], [17], [18] and hence, differences in the adaptive immune response to SIV are unlikely to be responsible for the differential immune activation of pathogenic and nonpathogenic SIV infection.
However, selection does not necessarily have to act directly on the colour trait to generate differences in the adaptive value of each morph, as there are several physiological, morphometric and behavioural traits associated with each colour morph upon which natural selection could act as well [4], [10].
Our analysis suggests interesting differences in the adaptive landscape for traits under abiotic and biotic selection.
The first hypothesis involved a difference in the adaptive landscape between the +EQU/−AND and the +EQU environments, one that allowed populations in the +EQU/−AND environment to cross what was an adaptive valley in the +EQU environment and thereby reach a peak of higher fitness.
This hypothesis is supported by some obvious differences in these adaptive traits [ 33]: The lonchophyllines have a deep longitudinal groove in their tongue, lined dorsal and ventral with hairlike papillae.
On a psychometric level, both groups showed no statistical differences in the Vineland Adaptive Behavior scale scores (table 3).
Alternatively, contemporary perspectives on self-compassion suggest that individual differences in this adaptive approach to self-regulation may serve to counteract these cognitive affective triggers presumably resulting in reductions in binge eating severity.
There are striking differences in the way the adaptive immune defence operates in birds compared to mammals [ 26] and it could be envisioned that such studies will reveal new insights in the evolution of vertebrate immunity.
