Sentence examples for differences in success of from inspiring English sources

None of the studies found differences in success of self-management interventions across different levels of age [ 40, 42, 50, 63, 96] or race [ 50, 63, 96].

Differences in success of recruitment methods were statistically significant in terms of identifying participants who were eligible and identifying participants who went on to enroll in the study.

Inspection of Ty1/Copia and Ty3/Gypsy content of plant genomes in a phylogenetic context reveals no congruence in their content even in closely related species and highlights differences in success of genome occupation[ 45].

All studies performed so far may thus have been inadequately powered to be able to reliably demonstrate a difference in success of thyroid ablation between these two radioiodine activities.

There was no difference in success of introduction between OFC and DBPCFC.

Comparison between positive and negative aPL patients revealed no difference in success of embryo implantation, as shown by the outcome of IVF.

At day 100, the adjusted difference in success of prophylaxis was 15·4% (95% CI, 6·6 24·2; P<0·01), favouring voriconazole (54·0% vs. 39·8% respectively).

Despite similar TAPET-CD colonisation levels in all tumours, growth delay assays showed a significant difference in success of the TAPET-CD/5-FC therapy for the 'responders' vs 'non-responders' and the control saline-treated animals.

In the child intubation scenario, there was a statistically significant difference in success of the first intubation attempt (100 vs.54.5 %; p < 0.001) and overall success rate (100 vs.82.1 %; p < 0.001); however, there were no significant differences in the time to successful intubation (36.6 vs.35.4 s; p = 0.085).

The difference in success of recruitment methods (media techniques, direct patient contact and contact with healthcare providers) in identifying eligible subjects was statistically significant (p-value for difference in proportion of patients meeting eligibility criteria by individual recruitment strategies = 0.01), suggesting that these differences were not due to chance alone.

As there was a much higher percentage of freshmen in the hybrid section than in the traditional section (48 vs. 11%; Table 1), some of the difference in success of the two sections is attributable to the larger proportion of freshmen in the hybrid section.