Sentence examples for differences in specificity of from inspiring English sources

We used the data from trainees who handed in three or more forms to examine possible differences in specificity of comments of different trainee-trainer pairs.

To determine the differences in specificity of antibodies induced by the two adjuvants, and to explore if a particular domain-specific pattern correlated with protection, chimeric AMA1 proteins were used to determine the ELISA end-point titer against 3D7 AMA1 domains-1, 2, 3, 1+2 and 2+3 (termed D1, D2, D3, D1+2, D2+3 proteins respectively).

These varying patterns of CTGF protein distribution may be species-related or due to differences in specificity of the antibodies used.

These differences could be explained by differences in specificity of the inhibitors and/or differences in affinity for classes of sphingomyelinases.

An example illustrating the differences in specificity of the microarray probes and BLAST search is the case of SCO6833 (an isobutyryl-CoA mutase small subunit) which appears from the pattern of microarray probe-binding (see Additional Files 4 & 5) to be absent/divergent from S. lividans TK24 but which the reciprocal BLAST search (see Additional File 6) classifies as present/non divergent.

Nothing is known about the specificity of transfer or signalling pathways through MNs (Johnson and Gilbert 2015), but the differences in specificity of herbivores, and the differences in stability in mixed versus monoculture plant communities, provide fertile grounds for further research.

This results in a difference in specificity of up to 10-fold.

The difference in specificity of CL-K1 compared to other collectins is due to the presence of an extended binding site on the CRD.

The variations in correlation between PIMO- and CA IX-stained hypoxic fractions may be explained by a difference in specificity of CA IX when compared with PIMO (Kaanders et al, 2002).

We assumed that the specificity for Pap smear results plus HPV DNA testing was 65% and that an absolute difference in specificity of 3% between groups was the margin of superiority (i.e., a specificity of 68% or higher in the Pap smear result plus gene methylation levels would indicate superiority).

The difference in specificity for detection of CIN2+ using five HPV mRNA types vs nine HPV mRNA types (96.6 vs 93.9%, respectively) was not significant.