The phrase "differences in purpose" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing varying objectives or intentions in a particular context.
Example: "The differences in purpose between the two organizations led to conflicting strategies."
Alternatives: "variations in intent" or "divergences in aim."
We conclude that paradigm shifts in soil mapping and classification can be better explained by not only their correlation to historical improvements in scientific understanding, but also by differences in purpose for mapping, and due to advancements in geographic technology.
Nevertheless, the basic differences in purpose and reward can still be useful for comparative analysis.
Differences in purpose, content, ownership and timing of delivery of a diary suggest there is a need to consider whether the same intervention meets the needs of both groups of stakeholders.
all punctuation and let a search for "6/12" become a phrase search for "6" want toe be able to match on? to get arround a fundemental difference in purpose.
But Dickie is nevertheless onto something crucial to the degree he urges that a difference in purpose need not imply a relevant difference in attention.
Thus, the difference in purpose of task and goal interdependence (c.f. van der Vegt and van de Vliert, 2002), may explain the differential effect of task and goal interdependence on teachers' engagement in social and individual learning activities.
Another important factor that accounts for some of the differences between these two groups is their difference in purpose.
Our findings show that, despite differences in design and purposes, content, lay-out, length and initial target population of the three questionnaires, none appeared to be obviously better than the others, both when examining their characteristics and the patients' assessments.
Thus, it is the difference in purposes of expression between these two types of hybrid speech that explains why content bias produces different levels of scrutiny.
The lower homophily observed for male users may reflect the difference in purposes to sign up for social networking services as it was reported in previous literature.
Her conclusion echoes Kunnan's (1995) view that the complex interaction between social and cognitive factors may influence the test results of students in different testing scenarios, depending on differences in test purpose and the stakes involved in the local context.
