Sentence examples for differences in prospective from inspiring English sources

Significant differences in prospective teachers' CK and PCK in mathematics were found between different countries, supporting the assumption that OTL are crucial for the development of teachers' knowledge.

Based on this background, differences in prospective teachers' CK and PCK are expected.

It has been argued, however, that to study age differences in prospective memory properly one ought to make the ongoing task easier for older vs. younger adults.

Since intelligence is positively correlated with prospective memory performance [12], [56], [60], as well as with many other cognitive tasks, this confound artificially reduces the size of age differences in prospective memory performance.

The designs with ongoing task confounds can answer only one question: what are age differences in prospective memory when these confounds are present, that is, when the ongoing task is made easier for older versus younger adults?

One might argue that Einstein and McDaniel [4] and others who incorporated the ease of ongoing task confound into their designs aimed to equate functional difficulty of ongoing tasks for younger and older adults and that age declines under these "functionally equated" conditions reflect true age differences in prospective memory.

Serum HA level also did not show a significant difference in prospective follow-up between the two groups.

Interestingly, the one study that examined gender differences in the prospective associations between ODD and CD showed that ODD appears to be a developmental precursor to CD only among boys [ 11].

Using a DMM framework we identified two subject groups with distinct microbiota profiles (FM1 and FM2) that exhibited statistically significant differences in the prospective risk of P. falciparum infection after accounting for age and other potential confounders.

The safety margin for bacterial kill when administrating antibiotics is such that reducing doses to half would require 5000 10,000 patients to show a difference in a prospective study.

In contrast with a large retrospective Canadian study referred to earlier, 35 we found no difference in our prospective study in hospital admission rate (grade 3 adverse event) between participants with cancer and those without (1.7% v 1.1%).