This is because a difference in structure doesn't correspond, for the situation semanticist, to a difference in proposition.
The account also provides for finely individuated propositions: differences in syntactic structure of sentences will carry over to differences in the propositions expressed.
Despite this, the range of a proposition is certainly an important aspect of informative content, and it is not immediately obvious why truthlikeness should be sensitive to differences in the way a proposition picks out its range.
The difference between the views concerns whether or not the information semantically encoded by utterances of belief sentences is sensitive or insensitive to differences in the way a proposition is grasped.
This makes it seem as though any difference between propositional signs should suffice for a difference between propositions, in which case analysans and analysandum could at best be distinct propositions with the same truth conditions.
We designed a public goods experiment with targeted punishment opportunities to (a) confirm subject heterogeneity, (b) test the stability of subjects' types, and (c) test the proposition that differences in group outcomes can be predicted by knowing the types of individuals who compose those groups.
These were empirical propositions, not basic differences in analysis; and if they turn out to be wrong (as they have), monetarism dissolves back into Keynesianism.
Doing so allows us to develop stylized facts and predictive propositions pertaining to differences in the innovative contributions, roles played in shaping industrial dynamics and evolution, and performance outcomes for startups stemming from the three entrepreneurial origins.
Aquinas objects that the differences in the sentences cause them to express different propositions, and so concedes that it is not true that whatever proposition ever expresses what God knows, always expresses what God knows.
The correlational nature of our data calls for cautious interpretation, but there is reason to trust the proposition that the differences in rumination and emotion regulation constitute vulnerability to depression in our sample.
