Sentence examples for differences in preservation from inspiring English sources

Differences in preservation success may be explained partially by different methods of drying – air-drying, oven drying, chemical drying or freeze-drying [17,18,22].

These illustrations provide quantitative insights into differences in preservation processes and provide a framework for evaluating processes when attempting to determine the process with minimum impact on the quality attributes of the product.

The system was originally set up to detect differences in preservation and authenticity of the material analyzed, relying on the fragmentation level [ 14].

Described differences in preservation of chromocenters were confirmed by quantitative, automated computational image analyses of 3D confocal stacks (object counting, supplementary online material S 2).

Where structures vary in morphology, e.g., the number of setae on the exopods, such changes do not correlate with size and may reflect differences in preservation.

Such differences in preservation and fixation could possibly affect the results, although both we and others have previously obtained consistent results with anti-S100A4 antibodies regardless of storage conditions or fixation method (Rudland et al, 2000).

It is probable that the difference in preservation treatment is due to a particular and precise phase in the history of Pompeyan painting preservation, during which attention was exclusively directed to the "figurative" parts, that is, to painted pictures inserted in the decoration.

Also, because of the sample preservation method (FFPE), using the HapMap data as a normal reference set proved difficult due to the very high noise level, likely from the difference in preservation protocols between the glioma samples (FFPE) and HapMap (frozen).

This interpretation is also supported by the total faunal diversity that includes taxa associated with woodlands as well as open habitat and taphonomic differences in the preservation and relative abundance of the different sloths.

DGF in the MOR allografts was unrelated to other differences in donor, preservation, or recipient characteristics in the comparative groups.

Differences in the preservation potential of crustal rocks may explain peaks in crustal ages previously attributed to enhanced crust formation.