Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
CI = confidence interval, OR = odds ratio, ref. = reference level In an analysis based on the original randomized-controlled study design (i.e. intention-to-treat analysis), treatment quality improved over time for both primary outcomes, although differences in improvements between the study supports area and usual supports area were not statistically significant.
These were much more marked in the back programme group than in the clinic group, and analysis showed that the mean differences in improvements between the two groups were significant.
There were no significant differences in improvements between groups.>> The percentages of the patients in each group who achieved 50% or greater improvement in SAD symptoms are shown in Figure 3.
Similar(57)
Previous randomised clinical trials (RCTs) demonstrated that olanzapine improves psychosis, but there were no significant differences in improvement between the olanzapine groups and the placebo groups.
ACT participants improved on pain interference, depression, and pain-related anxiety; there were no significant differences in improvement between the treatment conditions on any outcome variables.
The differences in improvement between years 1 and 2 suggest that it is not enough simply to provide students with tools that help them learn; they also need an incentive in the form of a grade or course credit to use the tools most effectively.
There were differences in improvement between the three groups (p<0.000).
Differences in improvement between 50 and 130 Hz or 50 and 185 Hz were significant.
The study was retrospective and no differences in improvement between groups were found.
No differences in improvement, between the three groups were seen between completed MMR and three month follow-up.
We have no good explanation for the differences in improvement between the individual scoring system items as each item was discussed in the consensus meeting.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com