Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(1)
Exact(38)
Thereafter, to further highlight the magnitude of the differences in fixation locations between observers from different cultures, we used the significant regions revealed by the Pixel test as a visual mask to define region of interest (e.g., roughly landing on the eyes, nose, and mouth; we also included the rest of the facial information in this analysis).
Importantly, no differences in fixation durations were noted.
There were no significant differences in fixation duration between the two conditions.
When levels of early migration are expected to vary due to differences in fixation, implant design, etc., it could be wise to disregard early migration data so as to make study comparisons more comprehensive.
The main focus of the present study was to investigate potential differences in fixation patterns between deaf and hearing participants.
Since we used the same antibody that was used in the Cao et al. [12] study, these differences may be due to species differences or differences in fixation.
Similar(22)
Analyzing the subgroup of participants that changed their preferred option between the conventional and DCIDA summaries shows even greater differences in fixations (Table 2).
There was no difference in fixation stability, distal cortical hypertrophy, or proximal stress shielding between the groups.
Although the difference in fixation pattern was clear, it should be noted that the present study has considerable limitations.
Since there was no difference in fixation duration and frequency outside the AOIs and no increase of fixation in the mouth region, the present finding cannot be explained solely by the attention emphasis on the peripheral processing.
Therefore, it is difficult to infer whether the difference in fixation pattern is due to the hearing loss itself, to the extended use of sign language, and/or to the specific historical situation of Japanese deaf education.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com