Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(1)
Exact(12)
Our data differ from theirs, and we have presented the most relevant differences in Figure 1.
While different feeding strategies may result in different PCB exposure pathways and may explain some of the smaller differences in Figure 2c and d, the data suggest that the relationships are quite robust for three different sediment dwelling organisms.
In order to explain the big differences in Figure 1, the longest corridor is selected, consisting of nodes 2, 5, 8, 12, 15, 20, and 21.
The significance of differences in figure 3, 5A, and 5B IL-24 mRNA levels and protein levels were determined by a paired t-test (two tailed).
Hence there are some dn/ds value differences in figure 3 vs figures 5 and 6, which are due to usage of smaller window sizes and ω in SWAPSC.
Means correspond to differences in Figure 1.
Similar(48)
There are also significant differences in figures from various sources.
The large RMS difference in Figure 5 reflects this mismatch.
A positive low difference in Figure 16(b) would indicate that the removed node is not particularly critical for the corresponding routing protocol.
The difference in Figure 18 is mainly caused by the limitation of calculation model which considered only vertical motion consumption and the errors of onboard control.
The statistically non-significant difference in figure 4 is reduced to almost zero (-0.05) with a wider confidence interval.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com