Sentence examples for differences in feedstocks from inspiring English sources

In addition to feedstock price, higher ethanol prices predicted in the present study can be attributed to the differences in feedstocks, pretreatment technology, onsite/off site cellulase enzyme production, SSF/SSCoF/Consolidated bioprocessing, short/medium/mature technology scenarios and solid content of process streams.

Although stripping the catalysts gives rise to highly aromatic cokes (aromaticity>0.95), even for n-hexadecane, differences in feedstock composition are still reflected in the structure of the resultant cokes with those derived from n-hexadecane containing less condensed aromatic nuclei than those from heavy feeds.

In their work, a detailed analysis of assay conditions and differences in reactivity results based on differences in feedstock type is presented.

The difference in yield between Hammerschmidt et al. [ 17] and the present study could be attributed to differences in feedstock composition (this study used high-lipid yeast compared to high-protein yeast in the study in comparison), reaction parameters (residence time, temperature, catalysts, co-solvent) and reactor types.

However, these changes in amino acid proportions, due to differences in feedstock and enzyme sources, did not affect the overall fermentation profiles of S. cerevisiae 424A (LNH-ST) grown on the hydrolysate, as the results obtained in this study are comparable to those of our previous work [ 10].

The difference in feedstock origin, surface oxidation and CEC of biochar seem to cause varied direct and residual effects on growth and yield of crops (Liang et al. 2006).

The compositions of the main chemical constituents in the three different biomass materials are provided in Additional file 3: Figure S3 and highlight the compositional differences in the feedstocks before and after HPAC pretreatment.

The possible reason for this discrepancy could be differences in the feedstock characteristics used for incubation or the heat resistance capacity of the E. coli strains used by Aitken et al. (2007).

Regardless of the cause of this phenomenon, the assay allowed us to identify the correlation in an aggregate of 150 samples, demonstrating that it can be a powerful tool to investigate differences in cellulosic feedstock samples.

With careful selection of experimental conditions in each of the two assays, and with a good understanding of the agronomic backgrounds (pedigree) of the samples, the assay can be a powerful tool to investigate differences in cellulosic feedstock samples.

The primary differences in managing woody feedstocks for bioenergy production vs for pulp/sawtimber production include a higher frequency of pesticide and fertilizer applications, whole-tree removal, and greater ground disturbance (i.e., more bare ground during stand establishment and more frequent disturbance).