Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The major differences in eruption times among girls in both the maxillary and mandibular teeth were with the Iranian children [ 25] (Table 5) while among the boys, bigger differences were with the Australian [ 24] and Iranian children [ 25] in the maxillary teeth and Pakistani children [ 10] in the mandibular teeth (Table 6).
Similar(58)
The difference in eruption percent of canines and first premolar teeth between cases and controls was statistically significant (p<0.001).
Although there was no statistically significant difference in eruption times between zygosity and the sexes, there was strong genetic control with regard to the timing of primary incisor eruption with an estimated heritability of ∼ 82 to 94% in males, and 71 to 96% in females (2).
The products of phreatomagmatic eruptions are believed to be more regular in shape and finer grained than the products of magmatic eruptions because of the differences in eruptive mechanisms.
The diversity of volcanic lithofacies recognized in different areas of the IPB mainly reflects variations in proximity to source, but also differences in the eruption style.
The reason for the differences in tooth eruption times between boys and girls is poorly understood.
There were no significant differences in tooth eruption disturbances according to the type of tooth (p > 0.05).
Aim: To assess the differences in the eruption sequence of the mandibular canine and first premolar teeth in children with and without dental crowding.
The likelihood ratio tests were used to assess any significant differences in mean eruption times between contra-lateral teeth of right and left quadrants as well as antagonistic teeth in mandible and maxilla.
Other factors that could lead to observed differences in the eruption times between the two studies are that the previous study [ 13] was a national estimate based on a smaller sample of children (n = 622).
The average difference in mean eruption times of all teeth between boys and girls was 0.8 (range, 0 1.5) years.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com