Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(42)
At sequence read coverage >15x, the differences in error rates between the different variant calling approaches become negligible.
Interestingly, the interview data hardly revealed any differences in error management between therapists of different schools.
This suggests that interindividual differences in error rates and O R compatibility effects bind different variance components in the relevant brain areas that would otherwise be part of the residual, and hence would reduce t values.
We believe that the presence of obvious errors in a major database on a "well-understood" pathway merits further discussion, even if differences in error calling will of course result in different percentages.
Gender differences in error are also discussed and analyzed.
The specific attributes of individual examiners that account for differences in error detection remain unknown, and are an important area for future research.
Similar(18)
In the present study, we examined group differences in Error-Related Negativity (ERN) based on perfectionism and emotional intelligence (EIQ).
The approach taken here was to link individual differences in error-related EEG responses to individual differences in white matter connectional anatomy.
Individual differences in error-related processing were revealed in the differences in P3 processing between the two conditions, such that trait anxiety, state negative affect, and baseline cortical asymmetry predicted differences in the cognitive processing of loss-related feedback.
We assessed between-block differences in errors of omission, errors of commission ad reaction time for the Go/No-Go Task.
The response in these areas may reflect several multisensory processes, including the integration of visual and vibrotactile stimuli at the single cell or population level, the detection and resolution of multisensory response conflicts, the generation of responses based upon these conflicting multisensory cues, and any differences in error-related processing across participants.
More suggestions(15)
differences in mistakes
differences in accountability
differences in conduct
differences in activity
differences in detail
differences in outlook
differences in speed
differences in qualification
differences in fact
differences in scale
differences in egg
differences in health
differences in style
differences in communicating
differences in size
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com