Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(9)
There were no differences in demographic parameters between the groups.
Intergroup differences in demographic parameters were evaluated with one-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparison post-test (age, interest in surgery, and experience in video games) and with chi-square test (gender, dominant hand side, and hand size).
There were no notable differences in demographic parameters between treatment arms overall or by country (Table 2).
This is conditional on the relative differences in demographic parameters of the competing species, however: if those differences are greater than even a large network difference, then demographic differences would still play a larger role than evolutionary differences.
An important caveat to the equalizing nature of genetic architecture change (by gene duplication and loss) is that differences in demographic parameters, such as generation time, could compensate for differences arising from gene regulatory network differences.
There were no statistical differences in demographic parameters between the groups.
Similar(51)
Results: There were no significant differences between groups in demographic parameters.
The nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test was performed to compare volumetric measurements and differences in the demographic parameters.
However, the result showed no significant differences in other demographic parameters, such as gender, race, religion, number of pre-school children, family size, educational level, or family income.
Most studies, however, only use estimates of reproduction, e.g. breeding success or production of young, and assume that habitat-differences in these demographic parameters will be reflected in local population growth rates, but if survival is not positively correlated to reproduction [see e.g. 59] this assumption may be not true.
Both groups were well matched with no significant differences in demographics, histopathological parameters, tumour stage or location (Table 3).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com