Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
This study used DD and DG procedures to determine if differences in contingencies of reinforcement specified by DD and DG alters how much organisms discount the value of delayed reinforcers.
Similar(59)
Differences in contingency tables were assessed for statistical significance using Fisher's exact test.
The statistical significance of differences in contingency tables was assessed by the chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test.
Avoidance habits were not the result of any measurable differences in contingency knowledge, explicit threat appraisal, or physiological arousal, suggesting that habits might be an independent contributor to the disorder.
To conclude, maintenance of the genome in the C. jejuni ST-677 CC lineage seems to be highly controlled, reflected in the high genetic similarity of unrelated genomes and the minor differences (one synonymous SNP and poly-G/C tract length differences in contingency genes) in epidemiologically related isolates.
As a result, the unconditionable participants responded equally to both stimuli, even though they noticed the difference in contingency.
However, there are some key differences in the contingencies of reinforcement between the procedures that may have implications for understanding impulsivity.
Significances of the differences in 2x2 contingency tables were always assessed with Fisher's exact tests as implemented in R. MDV, TLK, and ML conceived the study.
Differences between means were analyzed by the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test, differences in frequency by contingency tables and Fisher's exact test, and correlations by nonparametric Spearman's rank correlation.
Statistical differences in the comparison of contingency tables were analysed using the chi-square test, taking a value of α equal to or less than 0.05.
Differences in rates were evaluated using contingency table analyses.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com