These differences in the modulus data from the two studies were attributed partly to the differences in condition of the bone and differences in the dimensions of specimens tested in the two studies.
As the hypocenters of the earthquakes of which the stress drops were analyzed were close to each other, this possibility suggests that earthquakes involved in the cluster activity had small slip rates under no difference in conditions of stress and friction.
[4] This measure provides a means to precisely represent the difference in conditions of any two patients.
This is likely attributable to the difference in conditions of the two clamps, in that one is performed under hyperglycemic conditions of ∼225 mg/dL, resulting in greater glucose-stimulated glucose disposal compared with the other under euglycemic conditions of ∼100 mg/dL.
Third, a growing literature suggests that responses to interventions are different in different species due to in principle differences in initial conditions of complex systems (the organism) resulting in different genomic (and hence functional) outcomes [3],[32] [37][37].
The alternative to this explanation is that responses to interventions are different in different species due to in-principle differences in initial conditions of complex systems (the organism) resulting in different genomic (and hence functional) outcomes [ 46– 51].
Third, a growing literature suggests that responses to interventions are different in different species due to in principle differences in initial conditions of complex systems (the organism) resulting in different genomic (and hence functional) outcomes [ 3],[ 4],[ 32]–[ 37].
Overall variability is also greater in OvCa patients than controls and this could be a result of differences in medical conditions of the OvCa patients.
This result is inconsistent with that of present study which may be due to differences in the conditions of the vermicompost process or laboratory conditions.
Although the two experiments are not directly comparable because of the differences in nutrient conditions of the ambient environment (Table S1), it is meaningful that in both cases P, not N, engendered shifts in bacterial and biogeochemical variables.
