Sentence examples for differences in cohorts of from inspiring English sources

Alternatively, phenotypic and/or genotypic differences in cohorts of patients could result in different neurophysiologic patterns.

Thus, our ability to determine meaningful differences in cohorts of this size is curtailed.

The dissimilar antimicrobial resistance profiles observed between clinical settings may reflect differences in cohorts of circulating MRSA isolates, especially between outpatients and inpatients, as has been demonstrated in other investigations (16, 27, 28).

The discrepancy between these previous reports and the lack of association observed in the present study may be explained in terms of differences in cohorts, observation time and covariate adjustment.

The power to detect meQTLs may be influenced by variations in allele frequencies and LD structure between cohorts, meaning we would expect to see differences in cohorts in which the length of expected LD blocks vary.

With regard to the limitations of our study, it is important to point out the presence of clinical heterogeneity among cohorts, such as differences in cohort size, number of X-rays per patient, year of disease onset, presence of ACPA, follow-up duration, and whether the feet were included in the radiological joint damage assessment.

Therefore, conclusions can be drawn about the changes over time independent of unmeasurable differences in cohorts.

This study was designed to apply methods for cell-type-specific differential gene expression analysis to experimentally obtained RNA-seq data and cell proportions to better understand the functional significance of cell-type-specific gene expression differences in matched cohorts of European derived healthy female subjects and patients diagnosed with SLE.

Apparently, differences in these cohorts of healthy individuals are substantial and may lead to major differences in the resulting 99th percentiles and therefore the biologically nonequivalent CDV.

Apparently, differences in these cohorts of healthy individuals are substantial and lead to major differences in the resulting 99th percentiles (the CDV).

While there are obvious differences in the cohorts of patients in these studies, disease prevalence differences are also due to how they were identified- highlighting the need for consideration in how co-morbidities are determined.