Sentence examples for differences in characterization from inspiring English sources

Furthermore, to evaluate differences in characterization performances between standard and small-voxels for SUVmax and TBratio, we compared the AUCs using a chi-square test.

In terms of socioeconomic status, 48.6% of the unimodal and 40% of the multimodal group belonged to class C. Statistical analysis showed that there were no differences in characterization of the groups (X 2 = 0.15) or age (X 2 = 0.82), gender (X 2 = 0.14), IQ (X 2 = 0.98), or socioeconomic status (X 2 = 0.72) (Table 1).

The results that we observed may differ from those observed in previous studies because of differences in exposure characterization, age range, and other population characteristics.

This could contribute to differences in our characterization from the actual proteome, but it does not significantly detract from our use of the characterizations.

The reasons for sex differences in the characterization of social vulnerability and in associations with survival are unclear, suggesting a need for further research.

Because of differences in exposure characterization and HRV measures, direct comparison of our study results with previous studies is not feasible.

Injury dates more than 2 months apart were assumed to reflect separate injury events rather than differences in the characterization of one singular event.

Future noise research should focus on source-specific differences in risk characterization, combined effects, differences between objective (sound level) and subjective (annoyance) exposure on health, sensitive/vulnerable groups, sensitive periods of the day, coping styles, and other effect-modifying factors.

The results of these studies vary, possibly because of differences in exposure characterization, comparison populations and measures of PNS function in addition to small sample sizes (Kamel and Hoppin 2004; Lotti 2002).

Some of the important factors discussed by Scott and Chiu (2006) include weighing the strengths and limitations of various study types, and characteristics include study differences in exposure characterization and the relative sensitivity of mortality versus incidence data.

Additionally, no significant differences were found in characterization performances based on the accuracy between standard- and small-voxel images, with p = 0.11 for SUVmax and p = 0.29 for TBratio.