Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(5)
We used a pretest-posttest control group design to reveal significant differences between trainees and non-trainees.
The differences between trainees and sedentary people could be the result of factors other than irisin, they caution, and the experiment should have observed the same subjects both before and after exercise.
There were no consistent differences between trainees and supervisors.
The descriptive statistics presented in table 3 illustrate more similarities than differences between trainees and trainers.
Statistical comparisons of week 1 scores for trainees and wait-list controls revealed no significant pretest differences between trainees and controls in age, education, self-rated health, memory scores, general or memory self-efficacy, metamemory self-ratings, need for cognition, vocabulary, or digit-symbol performance.
Similar(55)
The comments were generally specific, but showed large differences between trainee-trainer pairs.
The implications of the substantial differences between trainee-trainer pairs in relation to the percentages of specific comments require further investigation as well.
Because of the differences between trainee-trainer pairs in the number of completed forms (range 1 23), we wanted to explore possible differences in specificity between comments of different trainee-trainer pairs.
The frequency of self-reflection and action plans varied, all comments were generally specific and there were substantial and consistent differences between trainee-trainer pairs in the specificity of comments.
The main findings of this study are that self-reflection by the trainee and formulation of an action plan were not uniformly reported on the assessment forms, the comments on the forms were generally specific and there were substantial, consistent differences between trainee-trainer pairs in the provision of specific comments.
There was no difference between trainees after the intervention in relationship to their affiliated hospital.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com