From Table 1, we see that the main difference between the processing of GRACE data of W1315 and L2013 is that the latter tried to restore the signal lost in de-striping filtering, but the former did not.
The major difference between the processing algorithms used in our study is an additional local contrast optimisation step when PV is applied.
This suggests that the categorization of elongation and compression in faces relies on holistic processing, and that there is a fundamental difference between the processing mechanisms used for categorization compared to geometrical discrimination.
Their preferences are necessarily weaker, resulting in a less marked difference between the processing of dominant and subordinate sentences compared with controls, and perhaps generally less stable syntactic representations possibly contributing to the left inferior parietal lobule activations discussed below.
This difference between the processing of numbers compared to letters might be based on the supportive effect of numerical semantic representations, which are assumed to be activated automatically even though task irrelevant [ 10, 11, 66- 68], while no comparable semantic representations are associated with single letters.
However, some evidence has suggested that the difference between the processing of upright and inverted faces may be quantitative rather than qualitative, with inverted faces being processed in a manner qualitatively similar to that for upright faces, but less efficient (Richler, Mack, et al., 2011; Sekuler, Gaspar, Gold, & Bennett, 2004; Willenbockel et al., 2010).
Encoding, consolidation and retrieval processes are distinguishable from each other and were divided per purpose within this overview in order to demonstrate the differences between these processing stages.
The results reveal that there are substantial differences between the neural processing of 3D SfS and 3D SfT.
The aim of this work was to test whether the differences usually found between the processing of visual stimuli corresponding to natural and artifactual domains reflect the different ways in which these domains are organized in the brain or are rather due to varying tasks demands.
To my eye there wasn't a huge difference between the two processing techniques when applied to this photo — the magic version produced a very slightly fuzzier result.
