Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(24)
A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by a Bonferroni adjustment of the P-value, was used to investigate the significance of the differences between the percentages of cells in the different cell cycle phases after treatment with ET-743 vs the untreated cells.
A 2 sample t-test was used to investigate the significance of the differences between the percentages of cells in the different cell cycle phases after treatment with VRL or VFL versus the untreated cells, 24 h incubation, 24+0 h, and 24+24 h schedule (see previous section for the explanation of the different treatment schedules), and to compare equitoxic concentrations of VRL with VFL.
There were also no significant differences between the percentages of response or remission rates in both groups.
The statistical differences between vaccine coverages were evaluated using the differences between the percentages.
There were no statistically significant differences between the percentages of HIV-positives and HIV-negatives by place of birth.
Differences between the percentages of patients withdrawing early from medication in each group were compared using Fisher's exact test.
Similar(36)
Accordingly, and with respect to trace conditioning, there were no observable significant differences between the percentage of CRs for the two groups [F 1,15) = 0.60; P = 0.44].
Here, we performed a two-tailed Pearson correlation analysis between the individual subjects' differences between the percentage of correctly identified letter targets at short and long SOA and individual p-values for the [dual task_800 versus dual task_200] contrast.
There were no significant differences between the percentage of Ret in MCLR-treated and control samples.
Differences between the percentage of records and the percentage of nUDD were statistically significant (analysis of variance, p-value 0.0038).
In order to compare the differences between the percentage of records and the respective percentage of nUDD per dose category, analyses of variance were carried out.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com