Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
The results of the simulations show that there are small differences between the evaluated cases regarding effectiveness.
There were significant differences between the evaluated categories, with the lowest percentage of female first authors in the category Surgery, followed by Emergency Medicine (Table 1).
The other reason could be the inclusion of relatively low number of animals together with high inter-individual variation, resulting in an absence of significant differences between the evaluated groups.
Similar(57)
The evaluation for male and female separately showed no clear difference between the evaluated parameters.
The major observations are related to the differences between evaluating the tool itself (macro-evaluation), evaluating the process of producing the tool (meta-evaluation), and evaluating products developed with this tool (micro-evaluation).
The differences between groups were evaluated by the χ test.
The differences between sensitivities were evaluated with the McNemar's test.
The differences between groups were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U-test.
Statistical differences between the groups were evaluated using the t test for paired data.
The statistical significance of differences between the values was evaluated using a one-way ANOVA.
We also observed that there were no differences between the two devices evaluated.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com