The main difference between the corpora was found to be a slightly higher probability of the recipient-PP structure in written English.
A primary motivation in the choice of corpora was the significant differences between the two corpora which suggest that trends common to the experimental results obtained from both corpora are much more likely to be independent of the test data and hence more likely to be applicable to any other emotional data as well.
But, aside from the cost, there is another key difference: the corpus of medical observations is based on classic clinical tests of a small number of patients.
The frequencies of BRI status for the antrum and corpus biopsies from the BG group and the corresponding frequencies for the Hp individuals from this group were all higher than the corresponding values in the control group; however, only the differences between the corresponding corpus values were significant.
As the figure shows, there is a substantial difference between the two corpora in terms of the percentage of mental and relational processes.
The corpora of other domains are known as contrasting corpora.
This drop in precision is to be expected, and can be explained by the differences between the annotation scopes of the training data, CHEMDNER, and of each of the latter three evaluation corpora.
When patients were categorized according to presence of IM in antrum and corpus specimens (separately), there were no significant differences between the mean ages of the groups with and without IM in both the antrum and the corpus.
To understand the conditions in which longer-length acoustic models result in considerable improvements in recognition performance, we carry out recognition experiments on both TIMIT and the Spoken Dutch Corpus and analyse the differences between the two sets of results.
The relative differences between the MI-related corpora were: 24%, 8%, and 0.7% for HI(ISI), HI(Scholar) and GI(Scholar), respectively.
