Sentence examples for differences between the conservation from inspiring English sources

Conversely, through interviews and surveys of utility managers, we ask if there are differences between the conservation strategies of California's public and private utilities during periods of water shortage.

The conservation index was calculated as the sum of the differences between the conservation rate of a known phosphomotif and that of the corresponding known and potential phosphomotifs in all species (Additional file 3-B).

We also found that the difference in ROC score between PWM and BBLS PWM correlated with motif information content (Spearman 0.62, two-sided p-value 0.075), meaning that the differences between the conservation-based BBLS PWM and the simpler PWM method were smallest for the information-rich motifs.

There is no significant difference between the conservation scores of NRdmiRs and PRdmiRs (W = 22320, p-value  = 0.2510, Wilcoxon rank sum test).

By examining the difference between the conservation and dependency between the codon and the triplet in the alignment, it conducts a filtering process on gene prediction results.

Nekrutenko et al. [ 14] used the K A / K S ratio test to detect the difference between the conservation of codons and non-codons, where K S and K A denote the synonymous and non-synonymous substitutions, respectively.

To determine the differences between the known and potential phosphosites, conservation indices (CIs) were calculated as the sum of the difference between the conservation rate of a phosphosite in a motif (C) and the reference conservation rate (R) of the corresponding amino acid residue obtained from all human proteins.

To determine the difference between known and potential phosphosites, we calculated a conservation index (S), which was the sum of the difference between the conservation rate of a phosphosite in a motif (C) and the reference conservation rate (R) of the corresponding amino acid residue obtained from all human proteins.

The relative conservation CR was then defined to be the difference between the average conservation for all instances of the kmer and the average conservation for all kmers within the set of sequences being analyzed.

Differences between the wood density of the conservation areas and the two different sampling protocols were tested with a one-way ANOVA and a multiple comparisons procedure using the grouping variables conservation area and sampling protocol.

The statistical significance of the differences between average evolutionary conservation levels was evaluated using the Students' t-test.