Sentence examples for differences between the allocation from inspiring English sources

There were no significant differences between the allocation groups in terms of a range of general health and psychosocial outcome measures at six weeks and six months postpartum [ 20].

If a student completes a master's program and then moves to a doctoral program, they receive four additional limited priority years, which is the difference between the allocation for a master's and a doctoral program.

There was no difference between the allocation groups in the frequency of neutropenic fever.

The results of analyses adjusted for potential confounders were similar, indicating no significant difference between the allocation groups.

The difference between the allocation groups was, respectively, 13 percentage points for COPD and 14 percentage points for DM2 in the proportion of practices that reported always using stratification at follow-up.

There was no difference between the allocation groups in the proportions of patients who had abdominal discomfort resulting from flatulence, borborygmia, or abdominal distension (grade 2 or 3 in 2 vs 7%, P=0.24), and the rates of chemotherapy-dose reductions due to bowel toxicity were also similar between the groups (P=0.20).

*Indicate a significant difference between the allocations groups (P<0.05).

At 12 months there were no significant differences between the two allocation groups in changes from baseline in the primary and secondary outcomes.

In this study, these differences between the land allocation zones are now also shown for AGB, which may support carbon stock estimations.

First, characteristics of the participants at baseline will be described and differences between the 4 allocation arms are tested using chi-square tests and ANOVA or non-parametric tests.

However, when we examined five published reviews that had conducted sensitivity analyses on pooled mortality data from RCTs, four of these found that larger effect sizes were associated with high-quality studies, not lower quality trials as has been convention, and the absence or presence of statistical differences between the two allocation groups remained constant.