Sentence examples for differences between review from inspiring English sources

Any differences between review authors concerning eligibility were reviewed by the third author (S.B.D).

A recent overview by Gough and colleagues attempted to outline the differences between review designs and methods by describing the important conceptual and practical differences amongst them [ 8].

Differences between reviews reflected differences in interpretation of inclusion criteria, searching and analytical methods or software.

We identified limitations in reporting as one of the main barriers to understanding differences between reviews.

Where multiple reviews exist on a topic, interpretation may require careful attention to apparently minor differences between reviews.

In light of these differences between reviews, the conclusions below about specific components should be regarded as tentative.

We have identified limitations in reporting as one of the main barriers to understanding differences between reviews of the same topic.

There were no significant differences between reviews published earlier and those published later as shown in Table 2. * numbers do not add up to totals because some reviews used more than one measures of accuracy; ** chi sq.

Length of stay outcomes was not always clearly defined or reported and differences between reviews may in part stem from the fact that they were measuring an outcome in different ways.

According to published information and the additional information provided, most differences between reviews arose from variations in inclusion criteria or inter-author study classification, as well as from different reporting styles (citation or non-citation) for excluded studies.

Extracted data were examined and tabulated to identify differences between reviews that may have influenced their conclusions and quantitative estimates of the effectiveness of enhanced recovery programmes compared with usual care.