Sentence examples for differences between journal from inspiring English sources

Henry and Conrad (2008) emphasized the major differences between journal peer review and the "more demanding" reviews that OMB's Peer Review Bulletin (OMB 2005) imposes on federal agencies regarding science they propose to rely on particularly "highly influential scientific assessments".

We analyzed the distribution of extracted categories of economic evaluations and investigated differences between journal specialty (medical vs. health care sciences journals, as defined by the ISI Journal Citation Reports subject category listing) and German and English-language articles.

Although central to these debates, there has been no thorough analysis of the similarities and differences between journal peer review and GLP with respect to process and objectives, the fitness for purpose of each within various scientific disciplines, and the implications thereof for regulatory/legal purposes.

Instead, the measure should be kept as a continuous scale so that small differences between journals are associated with similar decisions.

[ 4, 5] Studying the contribution of individual countries to leading journals in a given discipline can highlight which countries have the most impact on that discipline, and also give some idea of geographical differences between journals.

The influence of "tradition", fear or resistance to change within the veterinary community was also widely mentioned, as well as concern about cultural differences between journals and between countries, the increased workload that could be caused, and economic factors.

The first part of this study found major deficiencies in reporting, with 59%95%5% confidence interval; 56 62%) and 58% (56 60%) compliance with CONSORT [ 3] and STROBE [ 4] guidelines, and commented on differences between journals and paper types [ 2].

To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate this difference between journal types for the CONSORT-NPT extension and one of only a few studies to document NPT adherence.

Although there was some difference between journals, it was concluded that acceptance rates of hypotheses in soil science are relatively low compared to other scientific disciplines.

For instance, Budden's study of Behavioral Ecology was later contested by 32, who found no significant difference between journals that adopted double blind and single blind review.

Of note, the differences between the journals included are considerable, with ranges of 6%-100 6%-100nals) and 16%-81% (authors), respectively.