Sentence examples for differences between firms from inspiring English sources

Naturally, there are big differences between firms.

Moreover, "The rankings of firms seem to be scrambled during recessions to a degree which does not occur in other periods"."Recessions", says Mr Geroski, "are about what happens to differences between firms much more than they are about what happens to firms on average".

Our study is designed to contribute to this knowledge by profiling differences between firms identified as primary users of either judgmental or quantitative forecasting methods.

As we suppose basic structural differences between firms' demand attributable to certain characteristics, we distinguished the content of Table 1 by sector affiliation.

None of the variables related to cost structure (that is, factor/input prices), diversification, or capacity displayed statistically significant associations with the initial certification decision even though means comparisons indicate differences between firms in all capacity-related variables.

Given these striking differences between firms with regard to their energy cost shares, we aim to analyze factor substitution possibilities between input factors taking into account different levels of energy needs in the firms' production processes.

But there wasn't a big difference between firms founded by Ivy-league graduates and the graduates of other universities.

The authors also recognize that flexibility might be impaired by extension procedures given productivity difference between firms, leading them to recommend temporary opt-outs for firms needing time to adjust as well as what they describe as "top-ups" for the most profitable enterprises.

However, they are also an excellent opportunity to meet legal professionals face to face and try to work out the differences between different firms or chambers.

Specifically, potential differences arise between firms paying dividends with tax credits, paying dividends without tax credits, and not paying dividends.

It also conveys the difference between firm fact and flimsy hypothesis, and pinpoints those ideas, especially in cosmology, that may need radical rethinking.In line with the editorial policy of Nature, the book gives equal room to the non-physical sciences.