Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(2)
There is no difference of the percentages and total numbers of CD4/CD8 mature T cells in spleen and lymph nodes between CD4-FoxM1 mice and their wild-type controls (Fig. 2C).
There was also no significant difference in the proportion of BCL6+ CD4+ T-cells of SLE patients after stimulation with PMA and Ca-Io (14.0 ± 6.7% vs. 8.2 ± 4.3%, n.s).. Furthermore, the analysis of healthy controls (n = 4) revealed no significant difference of the percentages of ROR-γt+ CD4+ T-cells or BCL6+ CD4+ T-cells after stimulation, respectively.
Similar(58)
There was a significant effect of duration difference on the percentage of visual longer responses, F 4, 50) = 69.63, p <.001.
There was again a significant effect of duration difference on the percentage of visual-only longer responses, F 4, 50) = 37.03, p <.001.
Figure 4a demonstrates a significant effect of duration difference on the percentage of auditory longer responses, F 4, 50) = 17.62, p <.001.
The difference of the percentage of nitrifying bacteria may be affected by operational conditions and influent qualities.
Segmental 123I-mIBG washout was calculated as the difference of the percentage 123I-mIBG uptakes between the early (15 min p.i). and late (4 h p.i). SPECT images.
The rank of growth (that is, the difference of the percentage between n = 50 and n = 2) is 59.3 for δ = 0.1 and 76.3 for δ = 0.9.
The rank of growth for the first 100 metabolic subsystem (that is, the difference of the percentage between n = 100 and n = 10) are 59.6 for λ = 10%, and 45.4 for λ = 90%.
The rank of growth for the first 100 metabolic subsystem (the difference of the percentage between n = 100 and n = 10) are 40.5 for λ = 10% and 45.8 for λ = 90%.
No significant difference of the percentage of viremic cases was found between patients with mild diseases (grade 1 to 2) and with severe complications (grade 3 to 4) (27.5% and 20%, respectively, p = 0.41).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com