Sentence examples for difference of proportions from inspiring English sources
Table 2 and Table 3 show the difference of proportions obtained by the different data correction methods as well as the results of significance testing for possible skin contaminants and obligate pathogens, respectively.
In that situation, SYN did not work as it normally does, so there was no difference of proportions correct between items with different distractors.
Several methods exist to calculate sample size for the difference of proportions (risk difference).
Power analysis determined that a total sample size of 398 participants was required to detect a difference of proportions of headache of 10%, with a power of 80 and a 95% confidence level.
Since UA recall is more appropriate for unbalanced datasets, statistical significance over the baseline is determined using a one-tailed test (difference of proportions) over the UA recall values.
Fisher's exact test revealed a statistically significant difference of proportions of one-stage versus two-stage procedures due to the presence of perforation (p = 0.0003; Table 5) and a significantly higher trend for peri-implantitis in patients with perforation (p = 0.0004; Table 6).
The mean values of the two independent estimates were used if the estimated staining intensity scores did not differ more than by one step, or if the difference of proportion of positive cells was <30%.
The results of the Bootstrap calculating mortality rate in two groups are as follows: Table 10 ᅟ N Proportion of dead SD Difference proportion Sig 95%% Bootstrap percentile confidence interval for difference of proportion Temporary 1571 0.0159 9.96e–0.0146115 0.04 (0.0006, 0.0146) 0.02 Permanent 1571 0.0274 1.70.0274
No significant difference of proportion of Annexin A1 expression was found according to baseline characteristics with exception of pathologic differentiation grade and alcohol use (Table 1).
With one exception, none of the difference of proportion tests comparing the original and follow-up surveys within income groups was statistically significant.
