difference in waist

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "difference in waist" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing variations or measurements related to waist size, often in contexts like fashion, tailoring, or health. Example: "The difference in waist size between the two pairs of pants made it difficult to choose which one to buy."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

19 human-written examples

Secondary outcome measures were difference in waist circumference, BMI, eating behaviour and physical activity.

BMC Family Practice

There was a significant between-group difference in waist circumference in favour of the MUFI approach.

Archives of Disease in Childhood

There was no difference in waist circumference between the two groups.

BMJ Open

No significant difference in waist circumference was found after the 2 diets.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

There was no significant difference in waist circumference and serum lipids levels between two groups (all P > 0.050).

BMC Public Health

The primary objective in this study is to detect a difference in waist circumference with clinical significance.

BMC Psychiatry

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

41 human-written examples

Neither did analyses of ADRB2 haplotype combinations indicate any physiological impact on weight status except from the nominal difference in waist-to-hip ratio between the reference and the haplotype combination 6,2.

Plosone

When pair-wise comparisons of BMI, waist circumference and waist/hip ratio were performed, these combined haplotypes only revealed a nominal difference in waist-to-hip ratio between the reference and the haplotype combination 6,2, which had increased waist-to-hip ratio (p = 0.02; Table 2).

Plosone

Firstly, the site of waist circumference measurement has varied between studies and previous research has reported significant differences in waist circumference at different sites [ 30].

BMC Public Health

Finally, in the formal test of the interaction between study site, race and age, we found that the racial differences in waist circumference growth did not significantly differ among the three study sites (data not shown).

BMC Pediatrics

Secondary analyses among men with low educational level (INT n = 44; CON n = 41) revealed a significant between-group-difference in waist circumference of -1.56 cm (95% CI: -2.91 to -0.21; p = 0.03) at 12 month follow-up in favour of the intervention group.

BMC Public Health

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When reporting the "difference in waist", always specify the units of measurement (e.g., centimeters or inches) for clarity.

Common error

Avoid assuming that a "difference in waist" circumference directly causes other health outcomes without sufficient evidence. It may be an indicator, but not necessarily the sole cause.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "difference in waist" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the subject or object of a sentence. It refers to the degree of variation observed when comparing waist measurements in Ludwig's examples.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "difference in waist" is a grammatically correct and usable noun phrase, primarily employed in scientific and medical contexts to describe variations in waist measurements. According to Ludwig, the phrase is used to quantify the degree of variation. While not exceptionally common, its usage is well-supported by authoritative sources. When using this phrase, ensure clarity by specifying measurement units. Be cautious not to attribute causality based solely on "difference in waist" measurements.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

waist circumference variation

This alternative replaces "difference" with "variation", focusing on the degree of change in waist circumference.

waist size discrepancy

This alternative uses "discrepancy" to highlight inconsistencies or notable differences in waist sizes.

change in waist measurement

This alternative focuses on the act of changing waist measurements over time or between subjects.

deviation in waist size

This alternative uses "deviation" to suggest a departure from a standard or expected waist size.

waist dimension difference

This alternative emphasizes the measurable aspect of waist size differences.

divergence in waist circumference

This alternative focuses on how waist circumferences diverge or separate from each other.

contrast in waist sizes

This alternative uses "contrast" to highlight a noticeable difference between waist sizes.

distinction in waist measurements

This alternative emphasizes the clear and recognizable differences in waist measurements.

variance in waist size

This alternative highlights the statistical variability observed in waist size measurements.

difference in abdominal girth

This alternative uses a more clinical term, "abdominal girth", which refers to the circumference around the abdomen at the level of the waist.

FAQs

How is "difference in waist" typically measured?

The "difference in waist" is usually determined by subtracting one waist measurement from another, often to assess changes over time or variations between groups. Standardized measurement techniques are crucial for accurate comparisons.

What factors contribute to the "difference in waist" between individuals?

Genetics, diet, physical activity, age, and overall health status can all contribute to the "waist circumference variation". Lifestyle choices play a significant role.

Which is more accurate, using "difference in waist" or waist-to-hip ratio?

Both metrics provide valuable information, but they serve different purposes. The "difference in waist" simply quantifies the change in waist size. The waist-to-hip ratio ("waist to hip ratio") considers the proportion of waist size relative to hip size, which can be a better indicator of certain health risks.

What's the clinical significance of a notable "difference in waist" circumference?

A significant increase in the "difference in waist" may indicate increased abdominal fat, which is associated with heightened risks of metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes. Conversely, a decrease in waist circumference typically suggests improved health outcomes.