Sentence examples for difference in thrust from inspiring English sources

These observations have been noted previously (Booth, 2009; Ischer et al., 2009; Booth and Evans, 2011; Booth et al., 2013) but an explanation of the mechanism for difference in thrust produced per stroke had not been investigated.

There were differences in thrust force produced by individual strokes within a particular powerstroking bout, and a trend for the thrust per stroke to decreases as the time spent swimming increased.

Differences in thrust per stoke may be caused by differences in stroke amplitude and/or differences in the angle of the flipper blade or even stiffness of the flipper as it moves through the water increased mean thrust coefficient, or increased acceleration reaction due to decreased duration of acceleration phases of stroke cycle.

The aerodynamic design was focused on the minimization of the difference, in terms of thrust coefficient, with respect to the full scale reference.

We still need many more descriptions of shale-prone fault zones to understand the potential variations in thrust sheet structural style caused by differences in shale detachment characteristics.

Balancing cross sections is an important technique in thrust belts.

Thrust generated early in the downstroke was most likely generated by lift-based thrust while drag-based thrust was most likely responsible for the peak in thrust production that occurred later in the downstroke.

Two distinct thrust production patterns were identified, monophasic in which a single peak in thrust was recorded during the later stages of the downstroke, and biphasic in which a small peak in thrust was recorded at the very end of the upstroke and this followed by a large peak in thrust during the later stages of the downstroke.

Peak thrust during the biphasic thrust cycle occurred during the downstroke and had similar characteristics to the monophasic cycle, while the smaller peak in thrust occurred at the very end of the upstroke and most likely was generated by lift-based thrust.

The results also showed no significant difference in the pre-manipulative position, displacement of the thrust or side bending angular velocity.

Notably, there were no serious neurovascular adverse events reported by the participants in either of the trials, [ 53, 54] and both trials reported no statistically significant difference in the incidence of minor adverse events between the cervical HVLA thrust manipulation and cervical non-thrust mobilization groups.