Sentence examples for difference in the sum from inspiring English sources
However, for a large number of users, there is little difference in the sum capacity between LF-OSDMA and the extended LF-OSDMA, because LF-OSDMA can sufficiently get the multiplexing gain since there is a large number of users.
The feature value f j (x i ) of a Haar-like feature f j is defined as the difference in the sum of the pixel values of the white and block areas inside the rectangle in the detection window x i. Figure 1 Haar-like features in a detection window.
The traditional Adaboost face detection system employs an integral image that uses 3 × N × N operations in the detection window of size N × N to calculate the difference in the sum of the pixel values between the white and block areas inside the rectangular feature, as described in Section 2.
The difference in the sum score before and after menses was on average 7.6 for the VLBW group and 8.1 for the control group.
The significance of the difference in the sum of the site-wise log likelihoods of the two trees (unconstrained versus constrained) was then assessed using the SH test.
For further analyses, we calculated the difference in the sum of marked tile area within male pairs (hereafter " difference in the two males' scent marking").
However, connectivity values often vary between subjects and conditions, which may yield a clear difference in the total (summed) connectivity.
What is more, there is a significant difference in the sums involved.
Next to this, the ICER will be expressed as the difference in total mean costs weighed against the difference in the sum-scores between baseline and follow-up on functional performance, as measured with the Katz-15 index [ 28].
Thus, sbsRT diversity was greater in cancer and this could not be explained by the +3% difference in the sums of total tags counts.
Specifically there was a significant difference in the summed subscales of the MPS F [ F 3,15)=7.60, p<.005] over time, and a paired samples t-test showed that scores at post-treatment were significantly lower than at baseline [ t(19)=2.67, p<.05].
