Sentence examples for difference in the share from inspiring English sources

Interestingly, there was a significant difference in the share of students with commercial VET between universities and universities of applied sciences.

i There was also a difference in the share of students who had attended a commercial upper secondary school between universities (15.14%) and universities of applied sciences (20.51%), but it was not significant (Chi2 = 2.101, p = 0.147).

The difference in the share that was displaced from a declining labour market is small, and the share of workers that changes industry after displacement does not differ strongly between older and prime-aged workers.

The absence of a significant difference between national-market firms and exporters to the EU with respect to establishment average years of schooling, while the difference in the share of college graduates is significant and large, is somewhat intriguing.

Regarding the proportion of each category in the material footprint for cobalt, a marked increase is observed in the share of "other transport," with the difference in the share of this category between Q1 (16 %) and Q5 (35 %) being nearly 20%%.

There was also a marked difference in the share of capital and recurrent costs in the total between MCH and the special clinic.

However, the difference in the shares of men and women working zero hours is approximately the same when no children are present in the household.

Nor was there a statistically significant difference in the sharing of 'other injection supplies' in the preceding 30 days between those who reported NSP use and those who did not (AOR 0.85 (0.85-1.0.85.

The authors found no significant difference in the sharing of 'cookers or cottons' in the month prior to follow-up interview between those who reported 'ever' compared to 'never' using an NSP at study enrolment, with an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of 0.79 (95% CI 0.58 - 1.08).

There are huge differences in the share of intermediate imports in exports in different industries, which is a rough proxy for the extent to which trade rules have allowed global supply chains to flourish.

The result suggests that a more in-depth analysis is needed to explain differences in the share of temporary and permanent employment.