Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
We take the angular difference in the sets of flow vectors produced using two different systems by performing the following mathematical operation to produce the average of all absolute angular vector differences in percentage, Δθ where θa and θc represent the orientation of vectors for analytical and computational flow fields respectively.
Similar(59)
Recently, some studies have shown that there is significant difference in the set of variants called by different variant callers [ 7, 17, 18].
Bleary-eyed viewers tuning in to BBC Breakfast this morning might not have noticed much difference in the set or in the line-up of presenters (Bill Turnbull is still on the sofa).
The first main difference in the setting of JB∗-triples is the existence of Čebyšëv JB∗-subtriples with arbitrary dimensions.
The first main difference in the setting of JB∗-triples is the existence of Čebyšëv JB∗-subtriples with arbitrary dimensions; complex Hilbert spaces and spin factors give a complete list of examples (compare Remark 7 and comments before it).
However, we found no statistical difference in the setting ratios for the F1 progeny derived from the reciprocal crosses involving WT and Ospie1-1 or WT and Ospie1-2.
Generally the difference between the present study and the others might be due to the difference in the setting.
This difference could be explained by the difference in the setting; by time of analysis (> 10 years difference) and location (USA and Europe).
33 This number is much lower than our data suggest, and it might be explained by the difference in the setting and population.
There were significant differences in the sets of promoters bearing bivalent marks in the different cell types and few consistent differences between fNSCs and BTSCs.
(6) There were considerable differences in the sets of promoters bearing bivalent marks in the different cell types and few consistent changes from fNSCs to BTSCs.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com