A large difference in the point estimates between both estimators would highlight that time-invariant unobservables such as motivation, ambition, and ability play important roles in the training decisions.
The comparison of entry times between 1 and 2 weekly sampling showed little difference in the point estimates between the two regimes, however 2 weekly sample provided a wider range on the 95% confidence intervals.
There appeared to be a difference in the point estimates of the ORs between HLA-B27-positive and negative individuals (with HLA-B27-positive individuals showing stronger association for most SNPs) although the CIs around the estimates were wide.
And if that isn't problematic enough, there are even differences in the points from which measurements are made.
Scores for new-look EpiPen were similar to original EpiPen and Anapen (3.11 vs 3.32 points; 3.11 vs 2.90 points, both p=0.42), although there were differences in the points addressed by pharmacists.
However, this assessment should be tempered as Table 5 shows that for some specifications, we do not find significant differences in the point estimates between women and men, particularly in Panel 5 of the SLID data.
Together, the differences in the point prevalence, duration and coital exposure of concurrent partnerships we observe line up perfectly with the HIV prevalence differentials seen in these populations at the time they were measured.
This is illustrated by the differences in the point estimate for transplantation in Aboriginals under the age of 50.
First, when comparing BLOR with BLOR*, we see that there are differences in the point probability estimates, and the lower the probabilities, the greater the differences.
We did not observe substantial differences in the point estimates, as shown in Table 2, for any of these three factors.
