Sentence examples for difference in the penetration from inspiring English sources

This was confirmed, but there was no major difference in the penetration of DSS and Dextran when FITC-labeled conjugates were tested, since both compounds reached the epithelial cells within 15 min. This means that the high amount of bound sulfate on DSS must destabilize the interactions that maintain the organization of the mucus.

When cells were given a hyperosmolar condition by sucrose treatment, no markedly difference in the penetration ability of the 30Kc19 protein was observed (Fig. 6).

The differences in the penetration enhancements could be attributed to the chemical structures of the nanogels used in this study.

Higher water vapour permeability was measured for the bio-based films and there were differences in the penetration and impact resistance, tensile strength and degradation behaviour.

The analysis indicates that the observed out-of-balance voltage in the LHD can be explained by a difference in magnetic hysteresis between two symmetric coils, caused by differences in the penetration field and coupling time constant between the conductors.

To determine the Nv of labelled profiles (# labelled profiles/ μm), ultrastructural analysis was entirely carried out on the most superficial portions of the tissue in contact with the embedding plastic; from both vibratome section sides, to minimise artificial differences in labelling attributed to potential differences in the penetration of reagents as described previously.

Other imperfections are considered by adjusting the market penetration rate, taking account of a certain difference in the real penetration value vs the one calculated with pure cost figures.

There were significant differences in the optical penetration depths at five different laser wavelengths (P < 0.01).

These results demonstrate a major concentration-dependent difference in the uptake and penetration of cluster 1 and cluster w4 antibodies in this spheroid model and they have implications for the selection of antibodies for targeted therapy of SCLC.

Specifically, von Schewelov et al. (2006) reported that 3D wear measurements made from supine and standing (i.e. weight-bearing) examinations taken on the same day had a high correlation and there was no difference in the magnitude of penetration.

Digas et al. (2004) also found no difference in the proximal head penetration recorded, while Bragdon et al. (2006b) found small differences in some wear measurements between standing and supine examinations, but the occurrence was low and did not affect the average results.