Sentence examples for difference in the ongoing from inspiring English sources

To assess whether there is a difference in the ongoing pregnancy rate after transferring frozen-thawed embryos in natural cycles with spontaneous LH-P rise compared with natural cycles controlled by hCG for final oocyte maturation and ovulation.

The Google Chairman isn't alone in thinking this approach could help make a difference in the ongoing patent wars, evidenced by the growing community that is Article One Partners' global patent research platform.

But, cowed by deficit hawks, neither the Obama administration or Congress has shown an appetite for passing the sort of large-scale job creation packages that could make a difference in the ongoing jobless crisis.

A significant difference in the ongoing pregnancy rate was also observed between Group A and Group B (68.9% vs. 40.5%, respectively, p = 0.019).

There was no relevant difference in the ongoing pregnancy rates between subjects who received the hCG injection on the same day that three follicles ≥17 mm were observed (40.0 and 37.8% for corifollitropin alfa and rFSH, respectively) versus subjects who received hCG one day later (38.9 and 41.8% for corifollitropin alfa and rFSH, respectively).

This conclusion is based on the fact that the lower bound of the 95% CI for the treatment difference in the primary efficacy variable, ongoing pregnancy rate, was above the pre-specified non-inferiority limit of −10% for both the PP and ITT populations, a non-inferiority margin that was also employed for the original Endometrin study (Doody et al., 2009).

18– 20 The first, a small retrospective study, showed a dramatic difference (38% compared to 95%) in the ongoing use of home care services for reablement compared to usual home care recipients, respectively, at the 3-month review.

Although the difference in ongoing pregnancy rate per couple was somewhat lower than assumed in the power analysis (9.5% observed versus 12% expected), we consider this difference to be clinically relevant, especially as 15 minutes of immobilisation is a simple intervention with low additional costs.

In view of their differences and the ongoing nuclear debate, this paper aims to compare specific promising and emerging nuclear and renewable energy technologies in terms of their contribution to SD and prospects for deployment.

One striking difference between these two subtypes was in the ongoing use of HRT: 51% in the normal-like group versus 5% in luminal A. Genetically derived subtypes seem to be distinct biological entities, so we expect them to have prognostic implications.

Temporal leakage from evoked responses containing condition related differences in latency or amplitude could therefore lead to ITPC differences that are actually not present in the ongoing oscillations.