Sentence examples for difference in the methodological from inspiring English sources
No statistically significant difference in the methodological quality was observed between negative and positive studies.
However, planned comparisons revealed no significant difference in the methodological quality of interventions that reported a statistically significant change in walking or cycling (M = 5.67, SD = 0.77) compared with interventions that reported a statistically insignificant change (M = 4.90, SD = 1.29), t(26) = 1.99, p =.06.
From the above it becomes clear that the different energy gaps reported in the literature might result from differences in the methodological approaches used to calculate the energy gap.
Differences in the methodological rigor between studies — time elapsed since peritraumatic dissociation, design, sample type, and study type — significantly and sufficiently explained the variability in effect sizes between studies.
A concise, integrated comparison follows to highlight the main similarities and differences in the methodological requirements.
However, it is clear that in spite of the qualitative and quantitative differences in the methodological approaches used to identify the gene complement of the cenancestor, the inventories show an overlap which reflects an impressive level of conservation of a significant number of sequences involved in basic biological processes.
This was expected due to the differences in the methodological design underlined above.
We also perceived differences in the methodological characteristics of the networks, such as definitions and registration rules used.
Our research on the accuracy of the urine dipstick revealed differences in the methodological validity between European and American studies, but these differences had no effect on accuracy.
The differences in the methodological approaches of surveys refer to the timing of the research, location, and method of distributing of the questionnaires [ 19, 20].
First, differences in the methodological protocols, including the source and dilution of the antibodies and the systems used to assess positive immunohistochemical reactions, may produce significant variability among results.
