Sentence examples for difference in the interference from inspiring English sources
In subjects who were depleted on the first visit, the 'CW' latency was significantly lower following the control drink (t = -2.333, df = 8, P = 0.048) although the difference in the interference index did not reach significance (t = -1.809, df = 8, P = 0.108) (See figure 2).
Hence, distinct differences in the interference pattern of bare pSi films and pSi layers covered with polyNIPAM spheres could be observed upon their immersion in the respective solutions using reflective interferometric Fourier transform spectroscopy (RIFTS).
There was a strong trend towards a significant difference in the peak interference latency between L1 Chinese and L2 Chinese bilinguals (t 30.5) = 1.98, p =.06) such that the majority of L1 Chinese bilinguals showed peak interference effects at the 0 ms SOA, whereas the peak interference effects of the L2 Chinese bilinguals were more evenly spread over the –200 ms and 0 ms SOAs.
The horizontal axis presents the difference in the measured and interference signal power densities.
In D. pseudoobscura, in contrast, the overall higher rate of recombination on both X chromosomes and autosomes is likely to mitigate this X/A difference in the intensity of interference.
Monolingual English and L1 English interference effects and (b)) were compared at the –200 ms SOA using an independent-samples t-test (with Welch corrections to the degrees of freedom where the assumption of sphericity was violated), which showed no significant difference in the magnitude of interference (p =.76).
In our previous work [30] we found that the difference in interference between the two sexes on large chromosomes is related to the length of synaptonemal complexes at the pachytene stage of meiosis [36].
No significant statistical differences were found in the interference effect between the groups, nor was there a bilingual advantage in any of the three attentional networks.
The first aim of this study was to find a possible explanation for the difference in interference with the cisplatin antitumour activity between mesna and BNP7787 administration.
The difference in peak interference between monolinguals and the L1 Chinese is therefore more likely due to script differences than to differences in lexical access speed.
However, as already mentioned, there were differences across the groups in the patterns of interference for English and Chinese scripts: it may be that the difference in peak interference latency between monolinguals and L1 Chinese is due to these script differences rather than proficiency-driven differences in lexical access speed (see "General discussion").
