The EIS study demonstrates that the differences in the equivalent circuit fitting parameters can be related to the different surface characteristics of the electrodes.
Using experimentally estimated nucleation parameters in the modeling, a log normal nucleation undercooling distribution provided slightly but not significantly better agreement with experiments than a Gaussian distribution, with remaining absolute differences in the equivalent circular diameter of up to 31%.
The efficiency of the nanoparticles to inhibit the growth of microorganisms was determined by calculating differences in the equivalent number of colony forming units before and after treatment as a percentage of microbes that were inhibited by the particles and was calculated from the previous equation.
This is seen in Fig. 4, where the feedforward delay is taken to be 1 ms. The simulations used to produce Figs. 4, 5, and 6 were similar to those presented in the previous subsection, the only difference is in the equivalent PRCs used, and in the case of Fig. 4, the length of the feedforward delay.
The difference in the ionospheric equivalent current between the EEASs and omega bands may be attributed to a large temporal variation in the surge structure, in which the distributions of the FACs and the ionospheric conductivity vary from moment to moment, in contrast to the more stable, well-defined wavy structure of omega bands.
The difference in the chlorpromazine equivalent dose between the four groups was not significant (p = 0.192).
No significant difference in the imipramine equivalent dose was observed between the non-depression and depression groups (P = 0.155).
Focusing on only the patients who were taking antidepressants, the mCBF value in the depression group was significantly lower than that in the non-depression group (8 patients in each group; global P = 0.050; left hemisphere P = 0.038, right hemisphere P = 0.021), with no significant difference in the imipramine equivalent doses (P = 0.959).
According to Definitions 2.1 2.2, it is suitable to rewrite the fractional difference equations (1.1) in the equivalent summation equation u(t)=frac{u_{0}}{Gamma alpha)}t^{(alpha-1)}+frac{1}{Gamma alpha)} sum ^{t-alpha}_{s=0}bigl t-sigma(s) bigr)^{(alpha-1)}fbigl(s+alpha,u(s+alpha )bigr),quad tin mathbb{N}_{s=0}bigl t-sigma
