Sentence examples for difference in the derived from inspiring English sources

In practice, the difference in the derived E-values by the HMMER variants can nevertheless be problematic for overlapping HMMER2 and HMMER3 sequence-to-domain alignments.

Another method, ΔDAF [ 66], which is based on the difference in the derived allele frequency between populations, was also tested and no common signals were identified.

Although the measured and calculated spectra differ slightly, the resulting differences in the derived correction factors are less than 0.02%.

Statistical differences in the ratios of volume to various parameters of body composition may be related to differences in the derived body composition equations/nomograms rather than to true differences in RCV, PV, or BV.

A comparison of the pairwise distribution functions of the nonphosphorylated and phosphorylated SF1ULM+HH −U2AF65-UHM complexes by low-resolution small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) shows only minor differences in the derived radii of gyration for these complexes in both studies.

If policy makers are interested in allocating the budget for hospitals, then the corrected bootstrap should be employed since differences in the derived CE measure via the DEA and the more robust measure estimated by either the truncated or Tobit equation, on average, were 3%.

This latter metric can be interpreted as a guide of the topology of the difference in the STLs derived from the different configurations; if the difference involves a large "lump" of bone not correctly segmented, for example missing due to reduced HU in a particular region, then the volume will be large, but the surface area enclosing it will be relatively small.

There was no difference in the recipient- derived CD45.2+ KLS cell (Fig. 4E).

The latter feature is further evident from a remarkable difference in the crystallographically derived B factors of the apo and ligand-bound forms of HDAC8.

A measure of the variability of agreement is obtained by calculating the SD of the difference in estimates derived using the two different methods.

Both CRASH (AUROC 0.86, 95%% confidence interval 0.81-0.90) and IMPACT full-model (AUROC 0.85, 95%CI 0.80-0.89) were similar in discriminating between favourable and unfavourable neurological outcome at 18-month after surgery (p = 0.690 for the difference in AUROC derived from the two models).