Sentence examples for difference in the contamination from inspiring English sources

There was no significant difference in the contamination of mobile phones between male and female clinicians (76.2 % vs. 68.1 %, respectively p-value = 0.276).

When the radiology and order computers were grouped together into the "clinical use" category, there was no significant difference in the contamination rate between accounting (10/47) and "clinical use" (39/235) computers (p = 0. 439).

Of the samples collected from the AERs reprocess to the gastroscope and colonoscope, 2.0% (6/300) and 0.8% (1/120), respectively, were found to be culture-positive and there was no significant difference in the contamination rate between the AERs reprocess to the upper and lower GI tract (p > 0.05).

The current study was designed to investigate the differences in the contamination levels of selected FRs in the potable water of industrial, rural and background zones of Pakistan.

Taking into account the species, the multifactor analysis of variance showed that the difference in PCBs contamination observed in the two seas is mainly due to the PCBs content of S. scombrus and M. barbatus.

As an illustration, he points to a study of phthalates in olive oil, which found contamination in every sample tested, but no significant difference in the degree of contamination between oils packaged in glass, plastic, or metal.

The significant difference in the level of contamination of ward computers at different hospitals implies that computers can have very different roles as reservoirs of nosocomial pathogens.

To evaluate differences in the bacterial contamination rates of the vitreous cavity between patients undergoing transconjunctival 25-gauge microincision vitrectomy surgery (MIVS) and conventional 20-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV).

It must be noted, however, that there are large differences in the average contamination between individual countries, and it is not always evident in the various studies whether or not drinking water was included in the calculations.

We sought therefore to measure the difference in hospital contamination rates between the two species and to identify key risk factors for contamination of the hospital environment with these organisms.

For CNLOH, where there is a direct identification between allele frequency and the stage in which the mutation occurred, there is less difference in the methods only when normal contamination reaches ∼0.3 is there a difference if the read depth is 30×.